Singapore’s bomb shelters, are
they really necessary?
Singapore has a very good reputation for efficiency and high
standards of governance. It has come a long way moving from a third world
country to first world status in a very short time. However maybe because of
this rapid development some policies doesn't make sense and in my opinion turn out to be silly
policies. With the new wave of thinking post election 2011, we should now take time to discuss such policies and see if they really are needed. Most of these policies were never opened to the public for discussion. I am sure all the government think tanks would have gone through thyem but knowing how decisions are made in commiittees it may not have all the information to make a very good decision.
Bomb shelters in
every home.
When one enters a new home either a landed property or a
private condominium very often your host will show you a room tuck somewhere
near the kitchen. This room has thick concrete slabs and a thick metal door. In
it there are no windows except for a small ventilation hole. Welcome to the
bomb shelter. I was told you can find such rooms in public housing too.
This contraption is very much a secret in Singapore. It is
hardly publicised but when you want to build a new house your architect will
tell you that this is a requirement. Nobody can tell you why there is such a
policy in place. There seems to be no avenue for you to appeal.
When you dig it up you will find the reason for a bomb
shelter in the SCDF (Singapore Civil Defence Force) website. Here are some
excerpts from the web page.
Household Shelters
Description of
Household Shelters
The Household Shelter (HS) in a
dwelling unit is typically the store cum pantry with its walls, floor and
ceiling strengthened with increased thickness. The walls are set back by
specified distances from the building exterior and the entrance to the HS is installed
with an SCDF-approved light protective steel door. The HS gives protection to
the shelterees against weapon effects such as blast and fragments during an
emergency
Under the CD Shelter Act 1997, new
dwelling units (both houses and flats) are required to have household / storey
shelters incorporated in the developments.
With effect from 1 May 1998,
applications for planning permissions for new flats or houses submitted to or
lodged with Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) are required to incorporate
household or storey shelters.
Advantages of
Household Shelters
The household / storey shelter has the advantage of being easily
accessible to residents of the house or flat and apartment occupants when the
need arises. Life during an emergency can thus be close to normalcy. In the
case of a residential block of flats, it It is also economical because the void
deck space otherwise occupied by a public shelter can be freed for other
recreational and social uses, and maintenance cost is minimal.
Procedures for
Shelter Occupation
When the need arises (eg. before the onset of a war emergency), the SCDF
would increase the public education programmes to prepare the population on
precautionary and protective measures. Residents will be advised to prepare the
HS for occupation and adopt the appropriate procedures for shelter occupation.
Upon the sounding of the "Alarm" signal from the Public Warning
System (PWS)., the occupants are to move into the HS. During their stay in the
HS, they are advised to tune in their TV or radio for important messages issued
by the authorities. Once the "All Clear" signal is sounded, the
occupants can leave the HS and resume their daily routine.
National Defence in Singapore
Singapore is a very small country surrounded by neighbours many times
larger. Singapore was created through its colonial masters thus there is some
sort of underlying resentment as to its existence. Furthermore the majority
population of Singapore are made up of Chinese who are considered as migrants
to South East Asia. From time to time when elections are being held in the neighbouring
countries, inevitably inflammatory speeches are uttered. Thus there is always
this fear that the neighbouring countries will invade Singapore and destroy the
country when political differences arise.. National defence is taken very
seriously. All male citizens must take part in national service i.e. become a
soldier boy for 2 years. Then there is the regular armed forces. They are
equipped with the latest gadgetry and boast some of the most advanced weaponry
that money can buy. The armed forces are the active force and SCDF ( Singapore
Civil Defence Force) is the passive force. SCDF organises the general public to
be able to take care of the country in war times. SCDF are involved fire
fighting, rescue operations, ambulance services etc.
When in comes to National defence there is
very little debate on the subject. Most people until recently do not even know
how much money is spent on defence. It can amount to 20% of the country’s
budget. I am not sure if there was any public debate about this bomb shelter
act.
Is there a need for bomb shelters in
the house?.
There are very few countries in the
world that has such an Act that makes it compulsory for such a contraption at
home. Israel and Switzerland are probably the only countries that make it
compulsory. In the cold war of the 50’s it was popular to build nuclear
shelters in USA. However nuclear shelters were fairly big underground rooms and
equipped with all the necessities for a much extended stay. It was like a
replica of a small house so much so the whole family can live in it for weeks.
Singapore’s bomb shelters are
different. As can be seen from the SCDF write up they are very temporary in
nature. They are very small because as it is the apartments in Singapore are
already very small. It is also without ventilation mechanisms or any form
energy supply. Thus they are meant for very short occupation.
Now come the crux of the matter.
Cost.
As the guideline for the construction of
the shelter imposes a necessary thickness and strength of the structure, the
cost of building it is not cheap. To my knowledge the cost of such a room
ranges from $25,000 (twenty five thousand) to $40,000. This may cost even much
more so in a tall building as the additional weight has to be taken into
account. No doubt property prices in Singapore are very high and the additional
cost is not a deterrent. However as a national cost if one totals up the all
the cost of each household past, present and future then it is really substantial
sum of money. If Singapore built 100000
homes over the last 15 years the total cost for all the bomb shelters will be a
whopping $3billion to $4 billion.
That is really a lot of money to waste and can be better spend on buying
equipment for our armed forces. Furthermore most properties in Singapore don’t
last more than 20 years as there is great incentive to tear it down to build
newer buildings. These newer developments come ever smaller as the price per
square foot is ever rising due to the Singapore phenomenal of enbloc sale. What
a terrible waste of resources and time. As we want to be a greener society our
guardians insist on adding more rubbish.
Are this shelters really effective?.
It is effective as the SCDF states
against shrapnels especially flying glass or other objects. However when a
building is bombed, it usually catches fire. Thus the resident of the house or
building will be trapped in a burning building. This is made worst in a high
rise as the occupants may not even know the building is on fire as they cannot
hear the shouts of neighbours. When they feel the heat through the walls
obviously it is too late, every occupant will be roasted inside. When the heat
rises there will be frantic phone calls from the occupants.
Well if our enemies know this achille’s
heel then they will target to set fire to buildings instead of destroying it.
SCDF and our army will then be overwhelmed by calls to rescue them. The
authorities have created a false sense of security.
Other countries experience in times of war.
Inevitably as an entrepreneur I would
have run into the SCDF when I need to renovate a business premise. Singapore’s
style of doing things is fairly unique. The government sets up an agency to
draw up the rules and regulation. This agency then police the rules and
regulations they have drawn up. However your contractors are not necessarily
qualified to understand the requirements. Thus when you want to apply for
permission to do things you need to appoint a QP or qualified person who is
supposedly knowledgeable to all the rules and regulation. This QP will advise
your contractor on how all the requirements. SCDF will not talk to you or your
contractor.
Thus in one event I was so frustrated
by the outcome that I had personally had go down to see the FSB( Fire safety bureau
which is an unit of SCDF). After
trashing out the issue to my satisfaction I posed this question to the officer.
During the Vietnam war, Hanoi was
bombed endlessly by the Americans. Did he know whether the residents of Hanoi
had any bomb shelters and if not how did they survive the bombings. Well he had
no clue. When I told him how the North Vietnamese survive the bombings by
running into culverts and just cover the opening with a zinc sheet (which they
had build near their place of work or residence) he was flabbergasted. I had
emphasised to him how destructive the B52’s were during their bomb runs. There
are many names to such bomb runs, the most famous being carpet bombing. Those
people who live through it would not forget the name “Operation Rolling
Thunder” in which more bombs were dropped in North Vietnam than the combined
numbers during WW II.
So learning from the North Vietnamese,
we should be building culverts and not bomb shelters.
The maid’s torture chamber.
Nobody wants to talk about this issue
except if you search the expat forum you will find foreigners very amused. To
make matters worse most of these rooms are used for maid quarters. Imagine sleeping
in a room where there is little ventilation. If they close the door for
privacy, the room becomes very stuffy. I don’t think the authorities allow
aircons in these rooms. If they open the door then there is no privacy. I
wonder why the governments of countries who send us maids have never brought up
this issue.
I remembered the prime minister’s wife
bringing this subject up once in the papers. She is an engineer by training. Nothing
has come out of it.
The Swiss experience.
It seems like very soon Singapore is
the only country in the world that builds bomb shelters in homes. Switzerland
had one of the most elaborate self defence force and inevitably made
construction of bomb shelters in homes compulsory. However times have changed
for the Swiss. They have found these shelters becoming redundant. Now they are
usually used only as storerooms and some even completely locked away. As usual
with a historical baggage it is not easy for the Swiss to completely throw away
the idea. They have allowed the locals to pay a fee. They called it a fee to
pay for a space in a public bomb shelter which the government builds.
We are not so lucky in Singapore. There
is no such option. However if you are building a house and can retain some
structures of the old house then you may be exempted. Hmm if bombs drop from
the skies how can they differenciate an old house from a newly built one?
We are an inclusive society.
Recently we have been told our society
is moving towards an inclusive society. I find it a bit difficult to understand
the term. I have been checking with many people and asking them what they know about
the policy of bomb shelters. To my surprise literally none can come forward and
tell me the rationale behind this policy. As far as I can remember there was no
public discussion on this issue, thus nobody really knows why it was needed. So
how can the authorities implement a policy that affects every house owner
without prior consultation.
Soon we will be celebrating our 50
years of independence. Through these years Singapore has become a very
developed country. We have a population over 50 years of age highly educated
and with very good experience of every aspect of life. If we tap into the
knowledge by harnessing the power of forum groups, the country can do very much
more for our citizens without making such mistakes that can incur a lot of
money. I am sure there are better ways to do things.